Recovery of pecuniary loss from pension
Question From: Civil Law
One Punjab Govt employee has criminal proceedings in trial court.Now she died.Court abate proceedings.Can Recovery from Pension of pecuniary loss caused to Government be made even criminal proceedings abate.If pension is claimed by Legal Heirs.What is the fate.Can pecuniary loss caused to Government be recovered from Legal Heirs?
The abatement of proceedings against an accused has an effect of discharge/acquittal as the case may be. If proceeding is abated before framing of charge then accused shall be treated as discharged else acquitted.
In both conditions he is innocent in the eye of law. In your case, the criminal proceeding is abated because of his death and he shall be either discharged or acquitted by the court. In both conditions recovery of pecuniary loss cannot recovered from his pension.
Pension is the self earned property of the employee, according to section 60 of the CPC it cannot be attached.
Recovery of pecuniary loss from the pension of government employee is prerogative of the Governor.Governor takes such decision either on the findings of departmental inquiry or criminal proceeding.
Criminal proceeding is now abated so the Governor may take such decision on the finding of departmental proceeding if it is still in process or completed. But in each and every case it is mandatory for the government to declare the employee guilty of misconduct.
Image courtesy : google.com
Ask A Question
You can ask your question to Mr Shivendra Pratap Singh, (Advocate, High Court Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
Talk to Advocate
Talk to advocate on phone for 30 minutes and get solid legal advice
Succession Certificate: Section 372 [The Indian Succession Act, 1925] 372 Application for certificate. — (1) Application for such a certificate shall be made to the District Judge by a petition signed and verified by or on behalf of the applicant in the manner...
Sub-section 4 of Section 125 crpc enumerates that if a wife without any reasonable cause refuses to live with her husband, she is not entitled to maintenance. The court before granting an order of maintenance must examine the fact of refusal to live with the husband.
The land revenue record shows the land as inalienable when the tenure holder or owner of the land has no right to transfer the land. Generally, government land or patta land is made inalienable because actual right vested in the government. The tenure holder has the right to cultivate the land and enjoy the usufruct.
Section 154 CrPC does not mandate that only victim can lodge the FIR. Any person can register the FIR if he knows that a cognisable offence has been committed. In Prakash Singh vs State of Punjab, the Supreme Court held that police officer could not make an inquiry about genuineness of FIR.
Get A Quick Advice
Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes
Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe our newsletter to get our news as well as important legal updates of Supreme Court & High Courts