Right of daughter in coparcenary property

I want to know about the right of daughter in the father's property. Respected Sir, I need your valuable suggestions towards property rights of my mother and her sister. Their grandfather had few agriculture land and home property. He had settled those property among his four sons equally using a "kurra cettu" - local agreement during 1966. One of the sons is my maternal grand father. He had 3 sons and 2 daughters (including my mother). Recently came to know that he has executed a family settlement deed to the sons equally. My mother and her sister did not aware…

I want to know about the right of daughter in the father's property. Respected Sir, I need your valuable suggestions towards property rights of my mother and her sister. Their grandfather had few agriculture land and home property. He had settled those property among his four sons equally using a "kurra cettu" - local agreement during 1966. One of the sons is my maternal grand father. He had 3 sons and 2 daughters (including my mother). Recently came to know that he has executed a family settlement deed to the sons equally. My mother and her sister did not aware of it and they had registered the property in the registrar office in 2013.

Do we (my mother and my mother sister) have any rights to fight as the property came from  the grandfather considering as ancestor property?

Your mother and her sister have share in the property therefore, they can challenge the transaction by filing a civil suit. It was ancestral property and your mother's grandfather had settled among his children. After the family settlement the nature of property had changed. It became the separate property of each son. Your mother along with her siblings have coparcenary right in that property.

That coparcenary right is absolute in respect of that property because it was not the self acquired property of her father. He got that property from his father after the family settlement. However, the nature of property has changed but it is still a joint family property so far as relates to your mother and her siblings.

File a civil suit

Your mother and her sister should file a civil suit for cancellation of registration of settlement deed. That deed is bad in the eye of law because your maternal grandfather had executed in violation of the settled principle of law. It is a joint family property and all the coparceners have right therein from by birth.

According to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, the daughter has equal share in the ancestral property. When an ancestral property is divided or partitioned among the coparceners it becomes a coparcenary property of each coparcener. Your maternal grandfather was a coparcener at the time of settlement. At the moment he received the property after settlement, his children became coparcener in respect of that property.

Therefore, your mother got right in the property immediately when their father received it after settlement. So, your mother has the right in the property and her father cannot transfer that property to his sons by eliminating the daughters.

 

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Lessor has refused to renew the lease even after receiving entire rent

A business owner in Gujarat faces a legal notice to vacate after their landlord refused to renew a lease, despite accepting rent in advance. Legal experts clarify that payment does not constitute an automatic renewal when written permission is required. While the lease terminates by efflux of time, the tenant may negotiate for sufficient relocation time.

My neighbor has constructed a 6 to 7-foot compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available where a neighbour has raised a high compound wall obstructing light, air, access, or causing nuisance to adjoining property owners. It discusses municipal complaints, civil injunction suits, easement rights, and legal action that may be initiated against unauthorized construction.

My neighbor is constructing a house adjoining to my compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a neighbour constructs a building adjoining the compound wall without maintaining the required setback. It discusses municipal complaints, easement rights relating to light and air, temporary injunctions, and civil remedies available to prevent unauthorized or nuisance-causing construction.

Suit dismissed for defect in parties

This legal guidance explains the consequences of dismissal of a civil suit due to non-joinder or misjoinder of necessary parties. It discusses the remedy of impleading proper parties, restoration or refiling of the suit, amendment of pleadings, and the legal principles governing defect in parties under the Civil Procedure Code.