Section 138 of the negotiable instrument act 1881

My friend issued a cheque for the discharge of his liability but it is dishonoured due to insufficient fund. I want to know that when it can be said that offence under section 138 has committed. 

My friend issued a cheque for the discharge of his liability but it is dishonoured due to insufficient fund. I want to know that when it can be said that offence under section 138 has committed. 

Dishonour of cheque is an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The drawer of the cheque is the principal offender under Section 138.

If such cheque was drawn by a company then it shall be the principal offender. The following procedure is necessary to be followed by the payee (complainant) before filing the complaint under section 138. 

  1. payee presented the cheque for encashment within three months (within the period of its validity) from the date of issue of the cheque;
  2. drawee bank returned the cheque as unpaid;
  3. payee upon receiving the information about dishonour of cheque has sent a demand notice to the drawer for payment of money to which cheque was issued. 
  4. the drawer failed to make the payment within fifteen days from the date of receiving of demand notice. 

The payee must send the demand notice upon the drawer within thirty days from the receiving of information about dishonour of cheque. This is the limitation period granted for the issue of legal notice (demand notice) to the drawer. 

When the offence is said to be committed?

The offence is committed when drawer did not make payment within fifteen days from the date of receiving of the legal notice. If drawer made payment within said period then no offence is made out under section 138 of NI Act. Section 138 provides 15 days time to the drawer to make payment and honour the cheque which he issued for discharge of his liability.  

What is called dishonour of cheque?

Where a cheque is drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person and it is returned by the bank as unpaid, then it is called dishonour. The cheque may be dishonoured on the following reasons: 

  • insufficient fund in the account, or 
  • exceeding the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, or
  • the cheque was stopped by the drawer without any cogent reason, or
  • account has closed by the drawer before the presentation of cheque etc.

When drawer failed to make payment within 15 days of receiving of legal notice then payee must file a complaint under section 142 of the NI Act. He must file a complaint within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises.

When does the cause of action arise?

The cause of arises when the drawer of cheque failed to make payment within 15 days from the date of receiving the legal notice. The Supreme Court in Kamlesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar, (2014) 2 SCC 424 held that 

If the notice (drawer of cheque) fails to make the payment within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice, the offence can be said to have been committed and in that event, the cause of action for filing the complaint would accrue to the complainant and he is given one month’s time from the date of cause of action to file the complaint.

Hence, an offence under section 138 commits when the drawer of the cheque fails to make payment within 15 days from the date of receiving of legal notice from the payee. Section 138 gives 15 days time to the drawer for making payment so that absolve himself from the offence.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.