Sexual harassment in my office by one of my colleague

I am a working lady and sometimes stay in office till late night due to some workload hence, used to stay in the office till 9 PM. I have been working in a private form so bound to follow the instructions of my boss. In fact, one of our colleague is very irritating such as […]

I am a working lady and sometimes stay in office till late night due to some workload hence, used to stay in the office till 9 PM. I have been working in a private form so bound to follow the instructions of my boss. In fact, one of our colleague is very irritating such as interfering in my work without my desire.

Yesterday, he touched my private parts so as to show that it happened accidentally. Since he had the bad intention, therefore, one day he falsely said that my boss called me in his office. At the same time he followed me and locked the door from inside forthwith I entered the office. Unfortunately, there was no other staff except the peon. I strongly opposed his act thereafter he went out of the office.

His act constitutes the offence of sexual harassment punishable under section 354 A of the Indian Penal Code. Even today women have been placed at various disadvantaged positions in the society due to gender differences and bias.

In Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 SCC 241 the Supreme Court opined as sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination that undermines dignity, equality of opportunity and treatment between women and men.

It projects unwelcome sexual advances or sexual overtures in order to commit sexual harassment. Eventually, any action or gesture either directly or by implication aims at or has the tendency to outrage the modesty of a female employee generally falls under the terms of sexual harassment.

The act of sexual harassment violates the fundamental right of gender equality and the right to life and liberty. In Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 526: the supreme court has opined that sexual harassment at the place of work is incompatible with the dignity and honour of a female and needs to be eliminated and there can be no compromise with such violations.

Your colleague has committed sexual harassment because his act was not innocent. He committed those acts especially with the intention to outrage your modesty. He knew the consequence of his acts because he tried to find suitable occasions for committing those acts.

The supreme court in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan [(1997) 6 SCC 241] tried to define acts of sexual harassment as:

A physical contact and advances, a demand or request for sexual favours, sexually-coloured remarks, showing pornography and any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature constitutes an act of sexual harassment.

You may file either a complaint or FIR for the offence of sexual harassment. This offence is punishable under section 354-A IPC. There must be a physical contact with sexual advances or overtures so as to commit sexual harassment.

Section 354-A is applicable in a situation where accused committed a series of same acts so as to advance sexual overture [(2017) 237 DLT 271]. All the ingredients of Section 354-A are fulfilled in your case so you may initiate criminal proceeding as soon as possible.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.