Sexual intercourse by false promise of marriage

I have a relationship with my boyfriend for two years; recently, I came to know that he is going to marry another girl. I quarrelled with him, but he is saying that you don’t have status and beauty how I can marry you? However, we had a physical relationship for that also am having proofs, but now he left me and ready to marry another girl. I trusted him a lot and got miscarriage due to him now he is changing his words. I don’t know what to do, but I have the solid proof, and also he is saying…

I have a relationship with my boyfriend for two years; recently, I came to know that he is going to marry another girl. I quarrelled with him, but he is saying that you don’t have status and beauty how I can marry you? However, we had a physical relationship for that also am having proofs, but now he left me and ready to marry another girl. I trusted him a lot and got miscarriage due to him now he is changing his words. I don’t know what to do, but I have the solid proof, and also he is saying that I am a horrible girl. I can’t digest all these things I fed up physically mentally too.

You can prosecute him for the offence of cheating and rape. He has committed the crime of rape because he made a false promise of marriage. He took your consent for sexual intercourse by a deceitful act. You have given consent to establish a physical relationship because you have faith upon him.

Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines the offence of rape. As per section 375 IPC, sexual intercourse by a man with a woman without her consent will constitute the offence of rape. Where the consent is obtained by the misconception of fact, it constitutes the offence of rape.

In Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, (2013) 7 SCC 675, the Supreme Court holds that obtaining consent on the false promise of marriage amounts to the misconception of fact. Sexual intercourse on such misconception of fact constitutes the offence of cheating and rape.

In State of U.P. v. Naushad, (2013) 16 SCC 651, the Supreme Court decides that: In the present case, the accused had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix by giving false assurance to the prosecutrix that he would marry her. After she got pregnant, he refused to do so. From this, it is evident that he never intended to marry her and procured her consent only for the reason of having sexual relations with her, which act of the accused falls squarely under the definition of rape as he had sexual intercourse with her consent which was consent obtained under a misconception of fact as defined under Section 90 IPC.

In Yedla Srinivasa Rao v. State of A.P. (2006) 11 SCC 615, the Supreme Court holds the accused guilty of rape because he obtained the consent of prosecutrix by the false promise of marriage.

Your boyfriend was not honest right from the beginning of relationship. He never intended to marry with you, he only wants to satisfy his lust by making false promise of marriage. Therefore, he committed the offence of rape.

Hence, you may lodge an FIR under section 376 for the offence of rape. There is no limitation period for filing of FIR for the offence punishable with imprisonment of more than three years. If the police officer refuses to file your FIR, you may proceed with the Superintendent of Police under section 154(2) of the code of criminal procedure (crpc).

A police officer cannot refuse to register the FIR because the recording of FIR is mandatory under section 154 of the crpc.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.