Sexual intercourse by making a false promise of marriage

Sir, my boyfriend, established a physical relationship with me and deceitfully solemnised a marriage. After that, he used to commit sex with me and harassing me sexually, emotionally and physically. Recently, I came to know that he is planning to marry another girl. Currently, he is residing in his village. He is concealing the fact of our marriage and planning to cheat another girl. What should I do?

Sir, my boyfriend, established a physical relationship with me and deceitfully solemnised a marriage. After that, he used to commit sex with me and harassing me sexually, emotionally and physically. Recently, I came to know that he is planning to marry another girl. Currently, he is residing in his village. He is concealing the fact of our marriage and planning to cheat another girl. What should I do?

It is evident from the perusal of your case that he has no intention to marry you. He cheated you by a solemnising deceitful marriage ceremony. However, you did not mention what kind of celebration he performed for solemnising that marriage. I can understand that he did any defunct ceremony to show that he became your legally wedded husband.

He took your consent for sexual intercourse by the misconception of fact. Therefore, it is not free consent under section 90 of IPC. In this circumstance, you can file an FIR under section 417/375/376 Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the offence of cheating and rape. He committed the crime by deceitfully taking your consent for sexual intercourse.

As per the facts of your case, he has no intention to marry. His ultimate goal was to establish a physical relationship. Hence, he imitated the marriage ceremony.  Sexual intercourse by making a false promise of marriage amounts to rape. In Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, (2013) 7 SCC 675; the Supreme Court held that any consent given under a misconception of fact, would not be considered as valid consent, so far as the provisions of Section 375 IPC are concerned, and thus, such a physical relationship would tantamount to committing rape.

You should immediately file an FIR against him. More importantly, at the time of registration of FIR, no need to adduce any evidence. Your mere statement that he took you consent by the false promise of marriage and established physical relation is sufficient. The investigating officer shall initiate the investigation in your case immediately after registering the FIR. If the police officer refuses to lodge your FIR, you may approach the court under section 156 (3) of CrPC for registration of FIR.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.