SHO refused to take action on my FIR of cyber fraud

SHO straightway refused to take action on my FIR of Cyber fraud verbally & officially he says investigation under progress. Now six months have passed. What are the options left with me to compel police for rapid action?

SHO straightway refused to take action on my FIR of Cyber fraud verbally & officially he says investigation under progress. Now six months have passed. What are the options left with me to compel police for rapid action?

The officer in charge of the police station can not refuse to lodge your FIR. If information discloses cognizable offence, the police officer is bound to register the FIR. When the SHO has refused to record your FIR, you should proceed under section 154(3) of the code of criminal procedure. This section empowers the district Superintendent of Police to investigate the case upon receiving the information. He can also depute any subordinate officer to initiate the investigation.

According to Section 154(3) of the code of criminal procedure, you should send the substance of information by post to the superintendent of police. If again you get no response from the superintendent of police thereafter you have another remedy to improve the code under section 156(3) of crpc. You should contact a lawyer and file an application before the judicial magistrate under section 156(3). The judicial magistrate can order the station house officer to conduct an investigation.

He can also monitor the investigation by demanding from the SHO to produce a status report. In Sakiri Basu versus State of UP, 2007, the Supreme Court held that Judicial Magistrate has the power to monitor the investigation under section 156(3). The code of criminal procedure provides an alternate process to lodge the FIR.

Delay in FIR

Six months have lapsed and your FIR has not been recorded. In this situation, you should approach the court under section 156(3). The police officer has told you that investigation is in progress. It is not clear that which kind of Investigation is under process. Therefore you should approach the court to call the status of Investigation. The court may direct the investigating officer to produce the case diary in the court.

Upon receiving the case diary, the court will examine the nature of Investigation. If it is related to your case then the court will order the investigating officer to take your information under 162 of the code of criminal procedure. Thereafter, your information will come on that record. If it discloses any cognizable offence the investigating officer is bound to collect evidence in the same investigation.

If the investigation is not pertaining to your case then the court will order the SHO to register the FIR and conduct an investigation. The above-said provisions are related to the recording of FIR at the order of Investigation. There is a six-month delay in your case so you should proceed under section 156(3) CRPC.

FIR in cybercrime

If the FIR is related to the cybercrime you should first approach the cyber police station for the recording of the FIR. The cyber police station has a special power to investigate cybercrime cases. He can collect any electronic evidence pertaining to the commission of the offence. You can read here the procedure for filing of FIR in cybercrime.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.