Sister has illegal relationship with uncle

My sister has an illegal relationship with uncle. We had a friendship with a person 1 year ago and we considered that person as uncle but that uncle got physical with my elder sister by luring her with money. Both of them have left the city and they are living elsewhere. What should I do?

My sister has an illegal relationship with uncle. We had a friendship with a person 1 year ago and we considered that person as uncle but that uncle got physical with my elder sister by luring her with money. Both of them have left the city and they are living elsewhere. What should I do?

Your uncle has committed cognisable offence hence, you should immediately lodge an FIR against your so called uncle for the offence of kidnapping and rape. Lodge an FIR under Section 363 & 376 of the Indian Penal Code. If your sister is minor in age then you should also lodge FIR in the POCSO Act. 

The investigating officer shall trace them from their mobile location or receiving inputs from other sources. Don’t cause delay in lodging FIR because otherwise you have to explain the delay. However, there is no limitation period for recording of FIR because offences are punishable with more than three years of imprisonment. But you should take prompt action and help the investigating agency to find them. 

Your sister has been in an illegal relationship with the uncle (accused). If she is minor in age (below eighteen years) then her consent is immaterial. Absence of consent is mandatory for the offence of rape if your sister has attained the age of majority.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.