Sub inspector is conducting investigation under SC/ST Act

In the first information report the specific allegations were made towards the offence punishable under Sections 3(i)(x) and 3(2)(v) S.C/S.T. Act along with Section 307 and 149 IPC. the investigation has been handed over to the sub inspector XXX. That sub inspector is conducting investigation under SC/ST Act. The offence is punishable under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Any remedy?

Question: Sub inspector is conducting investigation under SC/ST Act. In the first information report the specific allegations were made towards the offence punishable under Sections 3(i)(x) and 3(2)(v) S.C/S.T. Act along with Section 307 and 149 IPC. the investigation has been handed over to the sub inspector XXX. That sub inspector is conducting investigation under SC/ST Act. The offence is punishable under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Any remedy?

It is pertinent to mention that as per Rule 7 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995, the offence committed under the S.C./S.T. Act should be investigated by a police officer holding the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or higher.

The provision mentioned is mandatory, and any violation of it would invalidate the investigation. In this situation, you should approach the Judicial Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to seek appropriate orders for transferring the investigation to a police officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or higher

If you receive no response from the Judicial Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC, you have the option to approach the High Court under Section 482 CrPC. The High Court can then direct the state to transfer the investigation to the Circle Officer within whose territorial jurisdiction the offence is committed. 

It is important to rectify this error before filing of the charge sheet, to prevent the accused from filing a petition in the High Court under Section 482 CrPC to seek the quashing of the charge sheet. Because if the sub inspector is conducting investigation under SC/ST Act and files charge sheet, it shall vitiate the investigation in per se. The high court will have no option except to quash the charge sheet. To avoid any untoward situation you should take prompt action to correct this legal impediment.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.