The police officer has refused to register my case

Police says, No fir can be the lodge for vehicle damage caused by any person. Yesterday at 11 pm, a boy from my colony came to me and asked for my car, but I refused to give him. Then he threatened me to break and damage my car, and he has damaged the door of my car. I called 100 and PCR referred me to the nearest police station. I went there, and the officer told me that there is no damage caused to human. So he couldn’t register FIR and legally no action could be initiated against him.

Police says, No fir can be the lodge for vehicle damage caused by any person. Yesterday at 11 pm, a boy from my colony came to me and asked for my car, but I refused to give him. Then he threatened me to break and damage my car, and he has damaged the door of my car.

I called 100 and PCR referred me to the nearest police station. I went there, and the officer told me that there is no damage caused to human. So he couldn’t register FIR and legally no action could be initiated against him.

The facts of your case prima facie prove that they have committed the offence of mischief. Notable, the mischief is punishable under section 426 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It is a non-cognisable offence. Therefore, the police officer cannot register the FIR. He can register a non-cognisable report under section 155 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (crpc).

Section 154 of the crpc provides a procedure to record the FIR in respect of cognisable offence only. Consequently, the police officer could not register your case in section 154 as FIR. In the light of your facts, he should have to record your information in section 155 crpc and direct you to approach the court for initiation of the investigation.

The remark of the police officer that no human can cause this kind of damage is entirely unacceptable. Because he could not reach at this conclusion without conducting an investigation. In fact, he had to record your information under section 155 crpc without making such a remark.

If the police officer does not record the information under section 155(1) crpc, then you can move an application before the Magistrate under section 155(2) of the crpc. The Magistrate shall direct the police officer to investigate the crime.

Alternatively, you may file a complaint under section 200 crpc for the said offence. If the court satisfies that the said offence has been committed, then he shall direct to initiate the investigation.

The conduct of a police officer is highly impermissible in the situation. The police officer is bound to register the NCR and refer the informant to move to the court for the direction of the investigation. However, the police has no power to investigate the non-cognisable offence without an order of the Magistrate whereas he has power to register the NCR in general diary.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.