The police officer is insisting me to provide the information in writing

When I went to the police station for recording an FIR but the police officer is insisting me to provide the information in writing. He completely denied accepting my oral information about the commission offence. I gave the information in writing after getting no other option. The police officer wanted to harass me as well as delaying the recording of FIR. It was a bizarre condition for me to face the arrogance of the police who was doing wrong. Sir, whether it is mandatory to file FIR in writing?

When I went to the police station for recording an FIR but the police officer is insisting me to provide the information in writing. He completely denied accepting my oral information about the commission offence. I gave the information in writing after getting no other option. The police officer wanted to harass me as well as delaying the recording of FIR. It was a bizarre condition for me to face the arrogance of the police who was doing wrong. Sir, whether it is mandatory to file FIR in writing?

Section 154 of the code of criminal procedure (crpc) enunciates that the police officer will reduce the oral information in writing. Therefore, he has no power to demand from the informant to give the information in writing. The crpc was first enacted in 1882 and the very first version; it devised the procedure for lodging of First Information Report (FIR). At that time, the literacy rate was too low, and it was the duty of the police officer to itself record all information in writing.

The same procedure is prevailing today, and officer in charge of the police station cannot insist on providing information in writing. However, the FIR is not a piece of evidence, and it has a minimal purpose. The primary objective is to receive the information as early as possible. Hence, the very first information about the offence is called the FIR.

Written information is not mandatory

In State of Haryana vs Bhajan Lal AIR 1992 SC 604the Supreme Court has held that the information must disclose the commission of a cognizable offence. The police office upon receiving such information he has no option except to record the FIR and launch the investigation.

In all cases, the investigation starts instantly after the recording of the FIR. If the police investigate the matter without registration of FIR, such investigation is disastrous in the eye of law. Though, in very exceptional cases, the police can investigate the case after making an entry in the general diary.

There is no provision in the code of criminal procedure which mandates that the police will register the FIR only on the receiving of written information. Hence, the act of that police officer is forbidden, and you can file a complaint before the Superintendent of police to take proper action against him.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.