Top floor owner wants to erect an illegal flat without permission of development authority

Top floor owner wants to erect an illegal flat without permission of the development authority. I am residing in a flat which is a 5 story building. The top story is in the ownership of a private limited company. That company wants to erect another floor without taking prior permission of the development authority. We are separate owners of 4 floors. Each floor has 6 flats, therefore, 24 flats owners are at risk of demolition if the company erects another floor without necessary permission from the development authority. Sir I want to know in this situation what would be the…

Top floor owner wants to erect an illegal flat without permission of the development authority. I am residing in a flat which is a 5 story building. The top story is in the ownership of a private limited company. That company wants to erect another floor without taking prior permission of the development authority. We are separate owners of 4 floors. Each floor has 6 flats, therefore, 24 flats owners are at risk of demolition if the company erects another floor without necessary permission from the development authority. Sir I want to know in this situation what would be the best legal recourse to stop the private limited company from erecting an illegal flat?

It is not appearing from your question that the top floor owner is doing any act to construct another floor. Unless and until the company does any act which has the effect that it is going to construct another floor you cannot take any action against the company.

Planning without any overt act does not constitute an offence or an act which is prohibited by law. There is no action on the part of the company which has the tendency to prove that it is trying to convert his illegal plan into reality.

If you have evidence to prove that the company is lurking to construct an illegal floor then you can file a civil suit for passing a temporary injunction against the owner of the top floor. Without having evidence you cannot get any relief from the court in the civil suit.

Thus, it is mandatory for you to collect some evidence before filing a civil suit against the company. Because the burden of proof lies upon you to establish the fact about the planning or design to construct an illegal floor. If the company is planning to construct another floor after taking requisite permission from the concerned authority then you will have no right to object.

Also read:

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Lessor has refused to renew the lease even after receiving entire rent

A business owner in Gujarat faces a legal notice to vacate after their landlord refused to renew a lease, despite accepting rent in advance. Legal experts clarify that payment does not constitute an automatic renewal when written permission is required. While the lease terminates by efflux of time, the tenant may negotiate for sufficient relocation time.

My neighbor has constructed a 6 to 7-foot compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available where a neighbour has raised a high compound wall obstructing light, air, access, or causing nuisance to adjoining property owners. It discusses municipal complaints, civil injunction suits, easement rights, and legal action that may be initiated against unauthorized construction.

My neighbor is constructing a house adjoining to my compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a neighbour constructs a building adjoining the compound wall without maintaining the required setback. It discusses municipal complaints, easement rights relating to light and air, temporary injunctions, and civil remedies available to prevent unauthorized or nuisance-causing construction.

Suit dismissed for defect in parties

This legal guidance explains the consequences of dismissal of a civil suit due to non-joinder or misjoinder of necessary parties. It discusses the remedy of impleading proper parties, restoration or refiling of the suit, amendment of pleadings, and the legal principles governing defect in parties under the Civil Procedure Code.