What will you do in an improper investigation

I filed an FIR for the offence of cheating. My friend took some money from me and now refusing to pay. He told me that he needs some money for her sister’s marriage. I had faith upon him and transferred money online in his bank account. After two years I asked him to pay the said money then he became violent and refused to pay. I inquired about his family and found that he has no sister. He cheated me and took money on a false promise. He has good contact with police officers. Therefore, the investigation is pending since…

I filed an FIR for the offence of cheating. My friend took some money from me and now refusing to pay. He told me that he needs some money for her sister’s marriage. I had faith upon him and transferred money online in his bank account. After two years I asked him to pay the said money then he became violent and refused to pay. I inquired about his family and found that he has no sister. He cheated me and took money on a false promise. He has good contact with police officers. Therefore, the investigation is pending since last year.

If the investigating officer does not honestly perform his duty, you can approach the superior police officer under section 36 crpc. Section 36 of the code of criminal procedure (crpc) empowers the superintendent of police to either to do the investigation himself or to assign any subordinate officer.

Generally, the superior officer does not take any step under section 36 crpc because of workload. In that situation, you have a right to approach the concerned Magistrate under section 156(3) of the code of criminal procedure.

Monitoring of an improper investigation

Section 156(3) confers on the Magistrate a wide power to monitor the investigation. However, the Magistrate cannot interfere with the investigation, but he can watch the probe. A magistrate has the authority to direct the police officer to investigate or re-investigate the case. To exercise that power, he can instruct him to do a proper investigation and submit a status report.

In Union of India v. Prakash P. Hinduja (2003) 6 SCC 195; the Supreme Court holds that the Magistrate on an application under Section 156(3) CrPC pass appropriate order if he satisfied that

  • the investigating officer does not investigate the case properly.
  • the officer in charge of the police does not perform his duty of investigation

The Magistrate can undoubtedly direct the officer in charge of the police station to make a proper investigation, and he can further monitor the same.

In Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P., (2008) 2 SCC 409; the Supreme Court holds that even though these powers not expressly mentioned in Section 156(3) CrPC, we are of the opinion that they implied in the above provision.

Hence, Magistrate has the power to monitor the case despite no such provision explicitly mentioned in section 156(3) crpc. If you approach the Magistrate under section 156(3) crpc and he did nothing on your application. Then, you can file a petition before the High Court under section 482 crpc for issues a direction for proper investigation.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.