Whether ACB can arrest accused person without register an fir

It is alleged that, Complainant went to Police station on 24/03/2023, and met the applicant accused. it is alleged that, the applicant accused demanded Rs. 1,00,000/- from the complainant for helping him in his Anticipatory bail application pending before Hon’ble Addl. Sessions Court, the alleged amount of bribe was not accepted by the applicant though there was a trap arranged on 27/03/2023. thereafter the bail application of the applicant filed before Hon’ble Ad(ll. Sessions Judge was rejected on 06/04/2023. Therefore, the complainant lodged by a complaint with ACB on dated 17 May 2023 but the applicants accused was arrested before…

Question: Whether ACB can arrest accused person without register an FIR? It is alleged that, Complainant went to Police station on 24/03/2023, and met the applicant accused. it is alleged that, the applicant accused demanded Rs. 1,00,000/- from the complainant for helping him in his Anticipatory bail application pending before Hon’ble Addl. Sessions Court, the alleged amount of bribe was not accepted by the applicant though there was a trap arranged on 27/03/2023. thereafter the bail application of the applicant filed before Hon’ble Ad(ll. Sessions Judge was rejected on 06/04/2023. Therefore, the complainant lodged by a complaint with ACB on dated 17 May 2023 but the applicants accused was arrested before few hours without register an FIR. If the accused was arrested before the FIR is filed, what action should be taken next?

In this instance, the ACB was required to file a formal complaint against the individual in question. It was not necessary to file a First Information Report (FIR) at this particular stage. If the ACB intended to take further action against the accused, such as conducting trap proceedings or making an arrest, they were obligated to document a "fard" which would later be converted into an FIR.

If the aforementioned procedures were not followed by the ACB, your arrest and detention would be deemed unlawful. You possess the right to seek bail and compensation from the state government for the illegal detainment.

To address the entire course of action, it is advisable for you to file a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226 of the constitution, seeking the annulment of the entire proceedings.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.