Government has appointed some engineers without publishing advertisement

The government has appointed some engineers in the irrigation department without publishing the advertisement. It is a grave irregularity because the department did not follow the standard procedure in appointment of candidates in the government job. The ministry of irrigation was involved in the procedure to select the candidates of his own choice. There is gratification and malpractice on the part of the government. Because of which the government has bypassed the selection procedure. I want to cancel this examination and conduct a fresh examination after publishing an advertisement and accepting application forms. Is it possible to compel the government…

The government has appointed some engineers in the irrigation department without publishing the advertisement. It is a grave irregularity because the department did not follow the standard procedure in appointment of candidates in the government job. The ministry of irrigation was involved in the procedure to select the candidates of his own choice. There is gratification and malpractice on the part of the government.

Because of which the government has bypassed the selection procedure. I want to cancel this examination and conduct a fresh examination after publishing an advertisement and accepting application forms. Is it possible to compel the government to conduct a fresh examination?

The government is bound to conduct a fair examination for selection of candidates on civil posts. Appointment of candidates without publishing an advertisement is a grave irregularity. It has hampered the entire selection procedure. 

Appointment without publishing advertisement is illegal

In Union Public Service Commission v. Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela:(2006) 2 SCC 482 the Supreme Court has held that: 

The appointment to any post under the State can only be made after a proper advertisement has been made inviting applications from eligible candidates and holding of selection by a body of experts or a specially constituted committee whose members are fair and impartial through a written examination or interview or some other rational criteria for judging the inter se merit of candidates who have applied in response to the advertisement made. 

A regular appointment to a post under the State or Union cannot be made without issuing advertisement in the prescribed manner which may in some cases include inviting applications from the employment exchange where eligible candidates get their names registered. 

Any regular appointment made on a post under the State or Union without issuing advertisement inviting applications from eligible candidates and without holding a proper selection where all eligible candidates get a fair chance to compete would violate the guarantee enshrined under Article 16 of the Constitution.

Therefore, the entire selection procedure is illegal and liable to be cancelled. You should file a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the cancellation of appointment and re-examination after publication of advertisement. 

Selection without publishing advertisement has blocked the eligible candidates from applying for the post. This is against the mandates or Article 16 of the Constitution. Right to equality and equal opportunity in appointment to government posts is a fundamental right. 

In Delhi Development Horticulture Employees' Union v. Delhi Admn., : AIR 1992 SC 789 the Supreme Court has held that there must be a notice published in the appropriate manner calling for applications and all those who apply in response thereto should be considered fairly.

In the State of M.P. v. Mohd. Abrahim : (2009) 15 SCC 214 again the apex court held that it is mandatory on the part of the employer to invite applications from all eligible candidates.

The High Court will cancel the appointment on the basis of violation of fundamental rights. You should file the writ petition as soon as possible.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.