Obstruction of public road for movement and services 

Obstruction of public road for movement and services. I am settled in a retirement home which is not a gated community and all the roads come under Panchayat administration as they have been handed over to the Panchayat by the developer in 1999 itself.  However the developer has installed a gate at the main entrance restricting the visitors and the services to us.  Is it not our Fundamental Right to move in freely and engage services of our own choice? Can a contract signed by us at the time of the purchase be evoked to suppress our free movement and in…

Obstruction of public road for movement and services. I am settled in a retirement home which is not a gated community and all the roads come under Panchayat administration as they have been handed over to the Panchayat by the developer in 1999 itself.  However the developer has installed a gate at the main entrance restricting the visitors and the services to us. 

Is it not our Fundamental Right to move in freely and engage services of our own choice? Can a contract signed by us at the time of the purchase be evoked to suppress our free movement and in engaging services of our choice? Can these violations be considered as criminal acts infringing our rights? Please clarify to proceed further.

Asked from: Maharashtra

The builder has handed over this project to the panchayat. Now the panchayat is responsible for maintaining security and providing facilities to the residents. For the sake of providing facilities it cannot impose unreasonable or arbitrary restrictions on the movement of residents and ingress of visitors. 

If the builder has installed this gate in violation of the sanctioned site plan then you should file a complaint before the administrative officer of the panchayat for its demolition. Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India [AIR 2018 SC 1665] the Supreme Court has held that

Word 'life' in Art. 21 has to be construed as life with human dignity. Any physical interference with person is, prima facie, tortious. If it interferes with freedom of movement, it may constitute false imprisonment. If it involves physical touching, it may constitute battery. If it puts a person in fear of violence, it may amount to assault. For any of these wrongs, the victim may be able to obtain damages.

Imposing unreasonable and arbitrary restrictions on locomotion or movement is violation of fundamental rights of citizen enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 

In this situation you should move a writ petition before the High Court for the illegal activities of the panchayat. You should file a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and seek direction to the administrative officer of Panchayat to ensure free movement and dignified living of residents. 

Any contract signed by residents which empowers the authority to impose unreasonable restrictions on the movement is void under Section 23 of the Contract Act. 

You can also file an FIR against the concerned officer of Panchayat for the offence committed under Section 341/342/344 of the Indian Penal Code.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.