Where to file a case when an armed forces officer is illegally dismissed from the service?

My younger brother is an officer in the armed forces. He was detailed in the ground duty where some miscreants came in the camp and fought with the jawans. The incident happened when my younger brother had detained a local person for carrying illegal weapon made in Pakistan. That local person was very influential and a lot of people assembled and came to the camp.  There was no adequate arrangement for tackling this kind of incident. Hence, my brother ordered the jawans to fire on the mob. Resultantly five people died. The chief took the cognisance of this incident and…

Where to file a case when an armed forces officer is illegally dismissed from the service? My younger brother is an officer in the armed forces. He was detailed in the ground duty where some miscreants came in the camp and fought with the jawans. The incident happened when my younger brother had detained a local person for carrying illegal weapon made in Pakistan. That local person was very influential and a lot of people assembled and came to the camp. 

There was no adequate arrangement for tackling this kind of incident. Hence, my brother ordered the jawans to fire on the mob. Resultantly five people died. The chief took the cognisance of this incident and dismissed my brother from his service and sentenced him to jail for two years. I want to challenge this order. Where should I file the case?

You should file a case (OA- original application) before the Armed Forces Tribunal. The tribunal has the jurisdiction to adjudicate all disputes of officers working in armed forces.   

In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261; the hon’ble Supreme Court has held that statutory redressal mechanism cannot be aborted. 

The Armed Forces Tribunal is the Court of first instance to adjudicate service disputes of officers working in armed forces. Hence, you should exhaust the remedy provided under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007.

You cannot file a case directly before the High Court to exercise its writ jurisdiction. Article 226 of the constitution vests writ jurisdiction in the High Court. If you want to challenge the decision of the chief you should file an OA before the tribunal instead of the High Court. 

In absence of the Armed Forces Tribunal ( statutory redressal mechanism) you can move a writ petition directly before the High Court. 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.