Can I claim compensation if engagement is broken for inappropriate reasons?

My cousin had an engagement. Can I claim compensation if engagement is broken for inappropriate reasons? Her fiance started talking on the phone. But due to her pursuing a degree course (of my cousin), she was not able to speak longer and every day. They are breaking the engagement. But we have asked them to compensate for our losses in doing engagement (1 lak). They don’t want to give any amount for engagement breakage. Under muslim law provisions what is the advice on this?

My cousin had an engagement. Can I claim compensation if engagement is broken for inappropriate reasons? Her fiance started talking on the phone. But due to her pursuing a degree course (of my cousin), she was not able to speak longer and every day. They are breaking the engagement. But we have asked them to compensate for our losses in doing engagement (1 lak). They don’t want to give any amount for engagement breakage. Under muslim law provisions what is the advice on this?

You should file a civil suit for the recovery of losses you have incurred in the ring ceremony. When the contract has been breached the responsible party has to compensate the other to the extent of loss he suffered due to breach of agreement. 

This is pure civil wrong thus you can move a civil suit irrespective of the religion. Engagement is an agreement of marriage therefore, it has a legal validity and upon breach of the engagement you can claim damages.

The fiance’s family is responsible for the breach of agreement hence, he shall compensate you. You have to produce the list of expenses along with the plaint. You are entitled to claim compensation if engagement is broken for inappropriate reasons.

In this situation you can also seek compensation for the mental agony, social humiliation, loss of reputation etc. No need to send a legal notice to them before filing the civil suit. 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.