Complaint against the additional district judges for their intentional violation of the established legal procedure 

I have lodged innumerable written complaints and unaccountable email petitions against the additional district judges for their intentional failure in following the established legal procedure. Complaint is regarding the judge for pronouncing the judgement without issuing me the summons notice before judgement in form no 4a of appendix 'b as required under sub rule (4) of rule (3) of the order xxxvii of the civil procedure code,1908. However, there was a petition filed before the high court for the expedite hearing.

I have lodged innumerable written complaints and unaccountable email petitions against the additional district judges for their intentional failure in following the established legal procedure. Complaint is regarding the judge for pronouncing the judgement without issuing me the summons notice before judgement in form no 4a of appendix 'b as required under sub rule (4) of rule (3) of the order xxxvii of the civil procedure code,1908. However, there was a petition filed before the high court for the expedite hearing. 

You should move a written complaint to the administrative judge of the concerned district. That complaint should contain irregularities  committed by the judge. 

You are going to initiate a proceeding against a sitting judge therefore, your complaint must contain credible evidence which tends to prove the grave misconduct of the judge.

Misconduct should be grave in nature because if there are curable irregularities in the judgement, it can be cured by the superior judge in appeal. 

Your complaint must prima facie prove that the judge acted deliberately and knowingly to cause wrongful loss to the complainant (you) and wrongful gain to that person in whose favour that judgement has been passed. 

The complaint should be made on the affidavit and adduced along with the copies of order sheet and erroneous judgement.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.