Advocate commissioner can be appointed under the SARFAESI Act

No idea about the SARFAESI. It's common to appoint advocate commissioner for taking possession of the property. Please suggest.

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | Mar 10, 2023 | Civil Matters

Advocate commissioner can be appointed under the SARFAESI Act. No idea about the SARFAESI. It's common to appoint advocate commissioner for taking possession of the property. Please suggest.

SARFAESI stands for the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, which is a law in India that allows banks and financial institutions to take possession of the assets of borrowers who default on their loans.

As per SARFAESI Act, banks and financial institutions can appoint an advocate commissioner for taking possession of the property. An advocate commissioner is a legal expert who is appointed by the court to oversee the possession and sale of property.

The advocate commissioner plays a crucial role in the process of taking possession of the property. They are responsible for verifying the identity of the property, ensuring that there are no legal disputes over it, and conducting the sale of the property. They also ensure that the sale proceeds are distributed appropriately among the various stakeholders.

If you are a borrower who is facing a situation where an advocate commissioner is being appointed for taking possession of your property under the SARFAESI Act, it is recommended that you seek legal advice immediately. A qualified lawyer can help you understand your rights and guide you through the legal process.

Author's Profile

Tags: SARFAESI

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Consult Online

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

Mar 9, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

Feb 7, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

Jan 11, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

Dec 25, 2024 |

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

Dec 2, 2024 |

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.