Criminal and civil proceedings can proceed simultaneously in cheating cases

This article discusses the legal principle that criminal prosecution and civil proceedings may continue simultaneously in cases involving allegations of cheating, fraud, or breach of trust. It examines the distinction between civil liability and criminal culpability, and explains that the existence of a civil dispute does not automatically bar criminal proceedings where the ingredients of a criminal offence are prima facie made out.

Criminal and civil proceedings can proceed simultaneously in cheating cases if both cases are made out against the accused. I have a company who is working in casting of industrial foundry products. My company has contracted another company for the supply of specific casting tanks for cement factories. After receiving a huge contract that company is causing a delay in supply of product. Then my legal team sent a notice to comply with the terms of contract failing which heavy compensation shall be paid by you. When my team conducted an initial inquiry against the company then came to know that the company has never worked in casting. That company committed fraud and misrepresented just to obtain a contract. Can I initiate criminal and civil proceedings against that company? 

 Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

The facts of your case suggest that deception occurred at the very beginning of the contract. The company, having no experience in industrial casting, made false promises to obtain the contract. When deception or inducement is present from the outset or at the time of entering into a contract, it constitutes the offence of cheating.

You can initiate both civil and criminal proceedings against the company simultaneously. In Indian Oil Corporation vs. NEPC (2006), the Supreme Court held that a commercial transaction or contractual dispute, in addition to providing grounds for seeking remedies under civil law, may also involve a criminal offence.

Similarly, in Syed Askari Hadi vs. State (Delhi Administration) (2009) 5 SCC 528, the Supreme Court ruled that civil and criminal proceedings may run concurrently. A criminal court may take cognizance of the case upon being satisfied that a prima facie case exists.

Cheating is both a criminal offence and a civil wrong. You are entitled to initiate both types of proceedings simultaneously. While there is no bar to doing so, criminal proceedings tend to take precedence over civil proceedings. For more legal help please visit Kanoon India.

Also read:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.