Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter and challenge of award passed by the arbitrator. I want to challenge arbitral award, so I want to know how to challenge that award? There was dispute regarding enhancement of construction work. The tender was allotted in 2006. It was responsibility of the government to provide land for construction. since there were some disputes between the state government and landowners, therefore, delay was caused in providing land to my company. In that turmoil the cost of the construction was enhanced. In the global slowdown in 2008 the price of steel became high. Because the grade and quality of steel required for the construction would have to be imported from China. My company requested the state government to enhance the project cost. The government was adamant to do the work on the value mentioned in the tender. When the dispute arose, my company availed arbitration proceedings. The arbitration and conciliation proceedings just completed and passed arbitral award in my favour. Please advise where to file execution proceeding in arbitral award. During the arbitration some applications were moved in the city civil court. But two applications were moved in the court of senior division. Those applications were disposed of. No other proceedings were either pending or disposed of by any other court. In this situation I am unable to understand where to file execution application. Whether I have to move application in the city civil court or before the civil judge senior division. Please help. 

Asked from: Tamil Nadu

You have to file execution proceedings before the Citi Civil Court. The proceedings before the civil judge senior division were erroneous because according to the provisions of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, civil judge senior division is not competent to hear the matter of arbitration. Either district judge or city civil court has the power to entertain matters related to the arbitration and conciliation. In JSW Steel vs Jindal Praxair Oxygen Co. Ltd. (2006) 11 SCC 521 the Supreme Court has held that:

Where in any reference any application under this act has been made in a court competent to entertain it, that court alone shall have jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that reference and the arbitration proceedings shall be made in that court and in no other court.

According to Section 2 (1) (e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, court means principal civil court of original jurisdiction in a district and includes the high court in exercise of its original jurisdiction. Hence, the court competent to hear and decide the matter pertaining to arbitration is either the District Judge or the City Civil Court. Civil judge senior division is not a competent court. Therefore, the subsequent and execution proceeding in arbitration matter shall be filed in the city civil court. You should file the execution proceeding in city civil court instead of senior division.

Also read: Dismissal of suit for want of jurisdiction

 

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Can I sue a person if the contract is unregistered?

This article discusses whether a civil suit can be maintained on the basis of an unregistered agreement or contract. It examines the legal effect of non-registration under the Registration Act, the distinction between admissibility and enforceability of documents, and the circumstances in which an unregistered document may still be relied upon for collateral purposes or for seeking specific relief before a civil court.