How much compensation would I get from MACT

I was a truck driver having a licence of the heavy vehicle from the transport office. I met an accident last year and my one leg and one hand are completely crushed. I was 28 years old at the date of the accident. I had been in the hospital for 15 months. I permanently disable to perform my job due to a 60% disability. I filed a petition before MACT for compensation under section 166 of the Motor vehicle act and section 3/4 of Employee’s compensation act. My advocate claimed 35 lakh rupees as compensation but insurance company in its…

I was a truck driver having a licence of the heavy vehicle from the transport office. I met an accident last year and my one leg and one hand are completely crushed. I was 28 years old at the date of the accident. I had been in the hospital for 15 months. I permanently disable to perform my job due to a 60% disability.

I filed a petition before MACT for compensation under section 166 of the Motor vehicle act and section 3/4 of Employee’s compensation act. My advocate claimed 35 lakh rupees as compensation but insurance company in its counterclaim said that only 2 lakh compensation should be made against the company.

Sir, I want to know how much compensation would I get from MACT, I have been filing ITR of rs 2 lakh income per annum for the last 2 years.

The MACT court awards compensation under section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act (MV Act). There are several heads to which the court may grant compensation, which covers:

  • Hospitalization expenses
  • Loss of earning.
  • Functional disability and unable to work for livelihood.
  • Medical expenses.
  • Compensation for pain and suffering during treatment.
  • Expenses of an attendant during treatment.
  • Transportation charges.
  • Compensation for special diet & nutrition during treatment. 
  • Compensation for loss of happiness and enjoyment of life etc.

If you are an income tax assessee then the court will consider your ITR for determination of your income and living standard.

Since you are a driver and suffered 60% injury. In this situation, you cannot resume your work. due to permanent disability. In Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar (2011) 1 SCC it is held by the supreme court that if a driver comes to the loss of earning due to a permanent disability then same may be treated as 100% disability.

Hence, the court will consider your disability as 100% due to loss of earning. You are not able to work as a driver and you have not able to do another work due to lack of experience. 

In Sarla Verma vs DTC (2009) 6 SCC supreme court held that compensation for loss of future income due to permanent disability shall be calculated by the court on this formula:- Per annum income of claimant × numbers of years likely to be worked by the claimant in future. Your age was 28 years at the date of the accident so you may work for 20 more years. Compensation for loss of future income would be at least 20 Lakh.

The court shall decide other compensation on the prevailing law and compensate the expenses incurred by you during treatment. It may be 4 – 5 lakh so you may get 24 to 25 lakh as compensation. In MCD Vs Uphar Tragedy Assn. (2011) 14 SCC supreme court that rate of interest should be applicable @9% from the date of filing of petition till the date of payment.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.