Enforcement of arbitration clause against unregistered firm

How to enforce the arbitration clause bearing in the agreement? If the partnership firm is unregistered, its partner cannot file any suit against the firm for the enforcement of any right. As well as an unregistered firm cannot file any suit against the third party for the enforcement of any right of the firm. Section […]

How to enforce the arbitration clause bearing in the agreement? If the partnership firm is unregistered, its partner cannot file any suit against the firm for the enforcement of any right. As well as an unregistered firm cannot file any suit against the third party for the enforcement of any right of the firm. Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, envisaged that:

No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract or conferred by this Act shall be instituted in any Court by or on behalf of any person suing as a partner in a firm against the firm or any person alleged to be or to have been a partner in the firm unless the firm is registered and the person suing is or has been shown in the Register of Firms as a partner in the firm.

Section 69 put a bar on the filing of a suit where an unregistered firm or its partner is filing such suit in their respective capacity. If a cause of action arises from an act of an unregistered firm and it affects right and liability of a third party, such third party can sue the firm irrespective of the fact that firm is unregistered.

Section 69 is not exhaustive; a partner of an unregistered partnership firm can sue the firm for settlement of accounts of the firm or dissolution of the firm. Hence, the exception is available only for two purposes like a) for the dissolution of the firm b) for the settlement of accounts of a dissolved firm. No suit shall be filed for any other purpose. Therefore, you cannot sue your firm for the enforcement of contract and sending of disputes for its settlement, to an arbitrator.

In Jagdish Chandra Gupta v. Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd. [AIR 1964 SC 1882]Since the right to resort to arbitration flows from the contract between the parties contained in the partnership deed, a suit or any other proceeding by a partner to enforce this term in the contract against the other partners would, therefore, normally be barred under the first part of sub-section (3) of Section 69.

Prem Lata v. Ishar Dass Chaman Lal [(1995) 2 SCC 145] an arbitration clause in a partnership deed of an unregistered partnership can be enforced for the purpose of securing, inter alia, a dissolution and accounts of the partnership or for enforcing any right or power for obtaining the property of a dissolved firm.

If dispute thereof is to the settlement of accounts of the firm by an arbitrator, you can enforce it because exception of section 69 provides that an unregistered firm can be sued for dissolution of firm and settlement of accounts of a dissolved firm. Therefore, accounts will be settled by an arbitrator but only in the case where a firm has dissolved. If a firm has not dissolved and an ongoing partner wants to settle its accounts, no such suit, as a partner, can be filed by him.

Tags: Civil Law

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.