Limitation period for setting aside sale of ancestral property

What is the limitation period for setting aside the sale of the ancestral property? My father sold ancestral property against the consent of my family. I was minor at the time of sale. Can I file any suit for cancellation of that sale deed?

What is the limitation period for setting aside the sale of the ancestral property? My father sold ancestral property against the consent of my family. I was minor at the time of sale. Can I file any suit for cancellation of that sale deed?

In India, ancestral property holds a special significance for Hindus. It is often passed down through generations and is considered a symbol of family heritage. However, there may be situations where a family member may sell the ancestral property without the consent of other family members. In such cases, the affected family members may want to challenge the sale and get the property back. One of the ways to do this is by filing a civil suit.

If a son desires to set aside the sale of the ancestral property, he can file a civil suit for cancellation of the sale deed. The limitation period for filing such a suit is three years when the buyer takes possession of the property. The limitation period starts from the date when the buyer takes possession on the basis of a sale deed.

However, if the son was a minor at the time of sale, he can file the suit within three years after attaining the age of eighteen years. Article 60 of the Indian Limitation Act states that a minor person should file such a suit within three years from the date when he attains the age of majority, which is eighteen years.

In cases where a guardian has been appointed by the court for the minor child, his age of majority will be considered twenty-one years. Therefore, he can file the civil suit within three years after attaining the age of twenty-one years.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.