When can I file complaint in cheque bounce case

When can I file a complaint about the offence of dishonour of cheque? Dishonouring of a cheque for insufficiency of the fund in the account is generally called bounce of cheque. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 envisages bounce of cheque is an offence and also provides punishment for the offence of cheque bounce.

When can I file a complaint about the offence of dishonour of cheque? Dishonouring of a cheque for insufficiency of the fund in the account is generally called bounce of cheque. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 envisages bounce of cheque is an offence and also provides punishment for the offence of cheque bounce.

For the initiation of a criminal proceeding for the commencement of offence it is required to make a complaint within the limitation period. No FIR shall be lodged for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881. FIR is lodged, under section 154 of the code of criminal procedure 1973, only in respect of the commencement of cognizable offence.

Dishonour of cheque is a cognizable offence but according to section 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, no court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under section 138 except upon a complaint.
The complaint shall be made after the commencement of offence. The offence of dishonour of cheque has been committed when drawee of the cheque is failed to make payment of the amount to the payee.

There are three stages to be fulfilled before the filing of the complaint. First, the cheque should be presented within a period of three months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity.
Second, when the payee receives information of dishonour of cheque for the reason of insufficient fund or any other reason, he should make a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing to the drawer of the cheque within 30 days of the receipt of information from the bank.

Third, after giving a demand notice to the drawer of the cheque for the payment of the said amount of money the payee should wait for 15 days for fulfilment of that demand. The offence is said to be committed if drawer fails to make the payment of the said amount of money within 15 days of the receipt of the said notice.

That 15 day is the waiting period for the fulfilment of the demand for money. No complaint shall be filed unless these 15 days has elapsed. It may be possible that drawer can fulfil the demand on the last day of said period. Hence, no complaint can be filed within 15 days of the date of receipt of the notice.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.