Cancellation of contract

My company had signed a contract with another company for digging the land for construction of railway lines and rail bridges. At the time of the contract, all the terms and conditions were finalised by the other company. Other company published a tender for the construction work. My company was the only one company selected for that work through tender. It is mandatory for the company to take the permission of the forest department which was refused by the said department. So I want cancellation of the contract on the ground that when permission is rejected by the government so…

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | Nov 19, 2015 | Civil Matters

My company had signed a contract with another company for digging the land for construction of railway lines and rail bridges. At the time of the contract, all the terms and conditions were finalised by the other company. Other company published a tender for the construction work.

My company was the only one company selected for that work through tender. It is mandatory for the company to take the permission of the forest department which was refused by the said department.

So I want cancellation of the contract on the ground that when permission is rejected by the government so work cannot be initiated but the other company file a suit for breach of contract and compensation for the cancellation of the contract. What should I do?

According to your case, you have the right to cancel this agreement because the performance of the contract is based upon permission of the forest department for initiation of work. However, tender is issued and completed according to the law but at that time it might be presumed that the forest department may give permission so no saving clause was included in the contract.

This contract is frustrated because not getting permission from the forest department. Section 56 of the Indian Contract provides a right to cancellation of the contract on the ground of frustration. Frustration is an act outside the contract due to which the completion of a contract becomes impossible.

After the parties have concluded a contract, events beyond their control may occur which frustrate the purpose of their agreement or render it very difficult or impossible, or as even illegal, to perform. You should take a plea of frustration because permission from the forest department is an event which is out of your control. And permission was a sine qua non for the performance of the contract.

In Nirmala Anand vs. Advent Corporation Pvt. Ltd AIR 2002 SC: it is held by the supreme court that the competent authority has been moved and application for consent or sanction have been rejected once and for all and such rejection renders impossible the performance of the contract due to frustration under section 56 contract act. The relief must be given to the party and keep them in the same position as they were before the contract.

When a contract becomes impossible to perform due to its frustration then it cannot be enforced by the court. You shall not be liable to pay any compensation.

Author's Profile

Tags: Civil Law

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Consult Online

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

Mar 9, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

Feb 7, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

Jan 11, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

Dec 25, 2024 |

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

Dec 2, 2024 |

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.