Celebration video got viral in social media amid lockdown

I'm a government employee, during corona all our office staff had a bday celebration and dance. That video has been leaked to the media and they have telecasted it multiple times. It has spread in social media. This incident had made it so big that we and our families suffered a lot. Consequently, we were suspended yesterday. Can we fight on this issue?

I’m a government employee, during corona all our office staff had a bday celebration and dance. That video has been leaked to the media and they have telecasted it multiple times. It has spread in social media. This incident had made it so big that we and our families suffered a lot. Consequently, we were suspended yesterday. Can we fight on this issue?

Asked from: Delhi

You breached the guidelines of the central government issued for containment of COVID 19. The video became viral on social media and the government took disciplinary action against you. That video is the clinching evidence of your conduct so it will be impossible for you to deny the content of that video.

When the government takes a disciplinary proceeding against the employee, it has to follow the rule of natural justice and procedure laid down in the service conduct rule. Whether the department has issued any show cause notice for clarification about the incident? Did the department give you a chance to prove your version against that video? 

If there are any procedural lapses then you can challenge the suspension order. First you should give a representation to the concerned competent authority to furnish the

  • Evidence
  • Statement of witness
  • Constitution of inquiry commission or board
  • Material available for framing of charges

The department is bound to furnish all the information available on the record. You have a right to claim further clarification and examination of witness before framing of charges against you. The suspension order is a major punishment. Therefore, you have the right to challenge it in the court if there are any procedural flaws.

Related

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Terminated from service for mere misconduct

This legal guidance explains the remedies available to an employee terminated from service for alleged misconduct without proper inquiry or proportional punishment. It discusses principles of natural justice, departmental proceedings, wrongful termination, reinstatement, back wages, and the legal remedies available before labour courts, tribunals, or constitutional courts.

Salary during termination period is illegally stopped by the department

This article discusses the legality of withholding salary during the period of termination or suspension from service. It examines the rights of an employee to claim salary, subsistence allowance, and other consequential benefits where the departmental action is alleged to be arbitrary, illegal, or contrary to service rules and principles of natural justice.

Daily wager service is terminated on misbehavior

This article discusses the legal implications of termination of service of a daily wager on allegations of misconduct or misbehavior. It examines whether principles of natural justice, departmental inquiry, and opportunity of hearing are required before terminating the services of a temporary or daily wage employee, along with the remedies available under labour and service laws.

Terminated from service by following illegal proceedings

This article examines the legality of termination orders passed after defective or unlawful departmental proceedings. It discusses violations of principles of natural justice, procedural irregularities in disciplinary inquiries, denial of reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the remedies available to an employee against illegal termination from service.