Cheque bounce case

Within what time can I expect justice for a check bounce case? (either I have to get money or action against the person who issued the check). If he fails to pay, what would be the minimum and maximum legal action against that person? What would be the approximate court expense and lawyer fee (pls mention yours) for undertaking the check bounce case? (In my case the check bounce amount is RS 50,000). Bouncing of a cheque invites criminal prosecution under section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Punishment for the offence under section 138 of the NI Act…

Within what time can I expect justice for a check bounce case? (either I have to get money or action against the person who issued the check). If he fails to pay, what would be the minimum and maximum legal action against that person?

What would be the approximate court expense and lawyer fee (pls mention yours) for undertaking the check bounce case? (In my case the check bounce amount is RS 50,000). Bouncing of a cheque invites criminal prosecution under section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Punishment for the offence under section 138 of the NI Act is imprisonment up to two years or fine which may extend to twice the cheque amount or both. The offence is bailable, compoundable and non-cognizable.

Proceedings for the dishonor of cheque must be issued if the cheque was issued in the discharge of lawful consideration. If it was issued for other purposes, any illegal gratification or any purpose mentioned in section 23 of the Contract Act, then no offence is made out on the dishonor of that cheque.

The payee makes a demand for the payment by giving a notice in writing, within 30 days of the receipt of information by him from the bank. When the drawer fails to make payment of the said amount of money within 15 days of the receipt of the said notice cause of action arises. The complaint should be made within one month of the date on which the cause-of-action arises.

According to the above mentioned legal provisions minimum, 45 days is required for filing of the complaint. It is a complaint case and it follows a summary procedure. The case will be registered on your complaint and notice will be issued to the accused. The court shall pass judgment on the recording of statements and appreciating the evidence adduced from both parties.

If both parties are taking interest in deciding the case then it’ll take 6 months to decide. Otherwise, it may take 1 to 3 years. I think Rs. 5000 will be the genuine fee for this case.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.