Exam has not been conducted on OMR sheet

The exam has not been conducted on an OMR sheet. I am working at CLW/Chittaranjan under the ministry of Railways as a Technician. This month I appeared in a promotional exam of Inter stage J.E. (LDCE). I was shocked in the exam hall to see the answer sheets, which were given to us to write the answer. It was not an OMR SHEET. We were given totally blank pages to write the question and its answer by hand. The answer sheet had no carbon copy in between, no identity and no copy number printed on it like an OMR Sheet.…

The exam has not been conducted on an OMR sheet. I am working at CLW/Chittaranjan under the ministry of Railways as a Technician. This month I appeared in a promotional exam of Inter stage J.E. (LDCE). I was shocked in the exam hall to see the answer sheets, which were given to us to write the answer. It was not an OMR SHEET. We were given totally blank pages to write the question and its answer by hand.

The answer sheet had no carbon copy in between, no identity and no copy number printed on it like an OMR Sheet. Mention one thing but the questions were 100% objective multiple types. While the Railway Board Rule 196 dt. 14.12.2018 clearly says that all the promotional exams should be on CBT Mode or on OMR SHEET. 

In the past the administration had been conducting the same exams on the OMR Sheet. Before this exam the administration has continuously conducted three such exams of JE on OMR Sheet and many other departmental exams also on OMR. The plain answer sheets can easily be changed with another one who has the approach but the OMR sheets are difficult to change as they are kept under the custody of two different officers at different places. And so the OMR Sheets are more reliable. 

When the Railway Board has ordered to conduct the promotional exam on CBT or OMR Sheet, how can the administration force us to write the exam on Plain sheet? When the administration was continuously conducting the same exams in the past on OMR Sheet then why this time not? Should the administration re-conduct the exam? Result is about to be published. What can we do to cancel this exam and to have a fresh exam? Thank you.

This is serious malpractice because it directly affects the authenticity and genuineness of the examination. When the other examinations are conducted by the same board on OMR sheets then the board has to follow the same procedure in this examination also.

Examination on plain paper gives an opportunity to manipulate the answer. Thereby, the board can easily qualify the candidate of its own choice.

In Union Public Service Commission v. Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela (2006) 2 SCC 482 the Supreme Court has held that the selection procedure which did not give fair chance to the candidate to compete in the examination violates the fundamental right. You should file a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for cancellation of the examination and issuing a mandamus writ.

The High Court will cancel the examination and direct the board, through the mandamus writ, to conduct a fresh examination on the OMR sheets.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.