Government initiates recovery from pension

A Punjab Govt employee was guilty of embezzlement of govt money in departmental inquiry and punished with the recovery of pecuniary loss caused to the govt. to the extent of 20 % (cut in pension ) for 5 years was being made from her pension. Now She was dead. Now the issue was whether this govt.money can be recovered from her own pension and family pension also. If the family pension is claimed by legal heirs Can pecuniary loss cause to Government be recovered from Legal Heirs?

A Punjab Govt employee was guilty of embezzlement of govt money in departmental inquiry and punished with the recovery of pecuniary loss caused to the govt. to the extent of 20 % (cut in pension ) for 5 years was being made from her pension. Now She was dead.

Now the issue was whether this govt.money can be recovered from her own pension and family pension also. If the family pension is claimed by legal heirs Can pecuniary loss cause to Government be recovered from Legal Heirs?

The Governor has a special power to recover from pension any loss caused to the government exchequer. The employee is bound to pay it even after retirement. However, the pension is self-earned income and the government cannot withhold it arbitrarily.

Deceased pensioner found guilty in departmental inquiry thereupon 20% pension had been deducted from her pension. Now she is dead, the question is whether the government has the right to recover remaining dues from her legal heirs?

No, legal heirs neither being personally liable nor their properties are liable to pay dues. The government can recover it from properties of heirs if they were appropriate all the properties of the pensioner with the intention to escape from paying debt, liability or dues.

When a criminal case is already abated but there are findings of departmental inquiry which empowers the government to initiate recovery proceeding but it is limited to the properties of the employee. The government can not recover it from the properties of legal heirs.

Whenever government initiates recovery from pension section 50 of CPC will apply. Section 50 says: Where the decree is executed against such legal representative, he shall be liable only to the extent of the property of the deceased which has come to his hands and has not been duly disposed of.

Recovery order of government is treated as a decree for the purpose of section 50. Only those part of the pension is liable to pay dues which came in your hands and not has been duly disposed of.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.