How to set aside ex parte decree passed in civil suit
The civil court has passed an ex-parte decree. I came to know about it from other sources. What is the remedy available against this decree? Can this decree be set aside?
Question From: Civil Law
You should immediately move an interlocutory application for restoration or setting aside the ex-parte decree. Court had passed the decree because you were absent in court when the case called for hearing.
If you have sufficient reason for non-appearance or absence before the court, then you can move an IA under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) for setting aside the ex-parte decree.
The ex-parte decree is passed by the court when the plaintiff appears, but the defendant remains absent. Both parties are bound to appear before the court either personally or through their advocate.
You have following remedies against the ex-parte decree.
You may file an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC for setting aside the ex-parte decree. or
File a suit, contending that plaintiff has fraudulently obtained the decree
Prefer an appeal against the ex-parte decree.
Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC, empowers the Court to set aside the ex-parte decree when the applicant shows “sufficient cause” for his absence.
You can avail above said remedies if you have sufficient cause for non-appearance otherwise court dismiss your petition. In State of Rajasthan v. Shankar Lal, (2009) 16 SCC 116 the Supreme Court is held that the reasons given for restoration of the petition should be satisfactory in considering the facts of the case. If there is no sufficient cause was shown for the restoration of the petition, then it should be dismissed.
In Raj Kishore Pandey v. the State of U.P., [(2009) 2 SCC 692] the Supreme Court is held that whether the applicant has made out sufficient cause or not in the application for restoration, the court is required to look at all facts pleaded in the application.
Hence, the court considers all the facts stated in the application. You should produce cogent evidence towards non-appearance.
Ask a question
Ask your question and get appropriate legal advice with relevant case laws
Talk to Advocate
Talk to advocate on phone for 30 minutes and get solid legal advice
I am a retired government servant. A departmental proceeding was pending at the time of my retirement. Therefore, the competent authority had forfeited my gratuity without holding me guilty of proved misconduct. He presented ambiguous inquiry report which is forthwith...
I was a public servant and retired from the post of superintendent engineer. No departmental inquiry was set up against me for the alleged misappropriation of government fund from the state treasury. My pension and gratuity are stopped without any reasonable cause. It...
I am a consumer of the Indane an Indian oil petroleum gas service, i.e. Indane. My distributor committed fraud by issuing several connections without having the authority. Later on, the Indane has terminated his agency and transferred all connections to another...
Under sarfaesi act violation of procedure and proceeded for property auction. In possession notice, date of demand notice was incorrect. Moreover, under 13 (3--A) bank has not responded for the representation given on the demand notice. How to quash or stop the notice...
Get A Quick Advice
Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes
Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe our newsletter to get our news as well as important legal updates of Supreme Court & High Courts