Neighbour causing nuisance in my property

Respected Sir / Madam, I have s strange problem due to my neighbours as they keep hammering out our flat with a hammer and same has been done for the last 3 years. I have made NC to the local police station along with NC for the last 3 years I am also having Video record clearly showing the hammer outside my house and on various occasion, I got a recording with me. Local Police of Borivali west is not able to take FIR not any action because the family has got some political pull with them. I have got…

Respected Sir / Madam, I have s strange problem due to my neighbours as they keep hammering out our flat with a hammer and same has been done for the last 3 years. I have made NC to the local police station along with NC for the last 3 years I am also having Video record clearly showing the hammer outside my house and on various occasion, I got a recording with me.

Local Police of Borivali west is not able to take FIR not any action because the family has got some political pull with them. I have got various NC for past years and video recording with me on various occasion. also, my parents both are sr. citizen. 

I want to know any strong action is possible from Court order as the local police have no say in this as per them this is a small issue. My parents are really tired of this for the past few years. All this is been done so that we agree to there terms of redevelopment and agree to the builder they want to hire. Thanking you and Regards.

You may initiate criminal and civil proceedings simultaneously. You may file a complaint before the sub-divisional magistrate, under section 133 Cr.P.C., for removal of the nuisance. Your neighbour is causing nuisance and in our legal system, both civil and criminal remedies are available.

After filing aforesaid criminal proceeding you may file suit for removal of nuisance, damages caused by such act of nuisance and temporary injunction.

In Gulam Husain Mirza vs Laxmidas Premji Alias Saga AIR 1983 Bom: any act or omission which has been causing annoyance or damages to any person in the enjoyment of property is called nuisance and it is actionable.

In Bamford v. Turnley, 31 L.J.Q.B. 292; an act comes under nuisance or not entirely depends on the surrounding circumstances and must necessarily be an actionable nuisance.

In light of the aforesaid judgments, any act which causes disturbance or obstruction in the enjoyment of property constitutes a nuisance and it is actionable. If nuisance caused to public at large then it is an offence under IPC but a particular person is affected from such act then it is called a private nuisance, however, it is not the offence but civil proceeding may be instituted for damages and removal of the nuisance.

Institute a civil suit, under section 91 CPC, against him. Video recording is a good piece of evidence. It is relevant and it is admissible under the Indian evidence act. You have to prove that your neighbour is doing a wrongful act. Damage or loss or inconvenience or annoyance caused to you from his wrongful act.

Such inconvenience or discomfort is more than mere delicacy. The court may pass a temporary injunction on the face of the record, your video/audio recordings are sufficient evidence to get a temporary injunction or stay order immediately from the court.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.