No EPF contribution by startup

No EPF contribution by startup. I switched job in 2018 from a MNC to a startup with 20+ employees. The startup is not contributing to the EPF. At the time of joining they said I could opt out (basic salary 15k+) of it and I agreed and completed the formalities. I am joining a new company now and they are asking for my PF statement. I do not have one but I do have a UAN number.  Is there a legal infirmity from my end in this case? Can my new employment be terminated on this ground? Can we opt…

No EPF contribution by startup. I switched job in 2018 from a MNC to a startup with 20+ employees. The startup is not contributing to the EPF. At the time of joining they said I could opt out (basic salary 15k+) of it and I agreed and completed the formalities. I am joining a new company now and they are asking for my PF statement. I do not have one but I do have a UAN number. 

Is there a legal infirmity from my end in this case? Can my new employment be terminated on this ground? Can we opt out of EPF when joining a  new company? I am confused because some people say we can while others say we can not. Please guide me on how to proceed with the new company.

It was mandatory for your company to contribute to the provident fund. You had been getting a salary of more than fifteen thousand hence, the provision of employee provident fund scheme was applicable. 

Provident fund contribution is mandatory if an employee (labour) is receiving a basic salary above six thousand five hundred rupees per month and he is employed in an organisation having more than twenty employees.

Your current company (employer) cannot fire you on the ground of not having an EPF account. In this condition, you should open your EPF account. The current employer will contribute to your EPF account. The loss you suffer is to not get benefits when you were employed in the previous company. However, you can claim contribution from your old company by filing a complaint before the assistant provident fund commissioner of Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO). 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Terminated from service for mere misconduct

This legal guidance explains the remedies available to an employee terminated from service for alleged misconduct without proper inquiry or proportional punishment. It discusses principles of natural justice, departmental proceedings, wrongful termination, reinstatement, back wages, and the legal remedies available before labour courts, tribunals, or constitutional courts.

Salary during termination period is illegally stopped by the department

This article discusses the legality of withholding salary during the period of termination or suspension from service. It examines the rights of an employee to claim salary, subsistence allowance, and other consequential benefits where the departmental action is alleged to be arbitrary, illegal, or contrary to service rules and principles of natural justice.

Daily wager service is terminated on misbehavior

This article discusses the legal implications of termination of service of a daily wager on allegations of misconduct or misbehavior. It examines whether principles of natural justice, departmental inquiry, and opportunity of hearing are required before terminating the services of a temporary or daily wage employee, along with the remedies available under labour and service laws.

Terminated from service by following illegal proceedings

This article examines the legality of termination orders passed after defective or unlawful departmental proceedings. It discusses violations of principles of natural justice, procedural irregularities in disciplinary inquiries, denial of reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the remedies available to an employee against illegal termination from service.