Obstruction in construction despite obtaining necessary permissions

Obstruction in construction despite obtaining necessary permissions. I have obtained the required permissions from the local Municipal Corporation for constructing my residential building. However, despite providing proper curtain cover to prevent dust and disturbances, my neighbours have been causing unnecessary disturbances and hindrances to our labourers and to the public road during the construction process. […]

Obstruction in construction despite obtaining necessary permissions. I have obtained the required permissions from the local Municipal Corporation for constructing my residential building. However, despite providing proper curtain cover to prevent dust and disturbances, my neighbours have been causing unnecessary disturbances and hindrances to our labourers and to the public road during the construction process. I kindly request advice on what strict legal actions or warnings can be issued to my neighbour to prevent interference in my construction activities.

Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

You should submit an application to the Sub Divisional Magistrate under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to address the obstructions created by your neighbour. Their actions are illegal, as if their rights are being infringed upon, they should file a complaint with the appropriate authority instead of causing disturbances or hindrances on public roads.

Under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), Magistrates possess authority to address public nuisances or wrongful acts impacting the public. This provision enables them to issue orders to eliminate or mitigate nuisances and prevent their recurrence. 

Key provisions include the issuance of conditional orders for the removal of nuisances within specified timeframes, immediate orders in urgent situations endangering public health or safety, and penalties for non-compliance with Magistrates' orders. 

Additionally, affected individuals retain the right to appeal Magistrates' decisions to higher judicial authorities. Essentially, Section 133 empowers Magistrates to swiftly tackle public nuisances, safeguarding public welfare, safety and removing nuisance causing by neighbour. Obstruction in construction despite obtaining necessary permissions is amount to nuisance. Aggrieved person should invoke section 133 crpc.

Section 133 crpc

Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) empowers a magistrate to issue a conditional order for the removal of a nuisance. Here's a breakdown of the key points:

  • Authority: District Magistrate, Sub-divisional Magistrate, or any other Executive Magistrate authorized by the State Government [1].
  • Circumstances for Order: The magistrate can issue a conditional order if they are satisfied, based on a police report, other information, or some evidence, that:
    • There's an unlawful obstruction or nuisance in a public place, public way, river, or channel.
    • A trade/occupation, keeping of goods, or construction activity is causing harm to public health or comfort.
    • There's a risk of fire or explosion due to a building or substance.
    • A dangerous animal needs to be controlled or removed. [1]
  • Content of Order: The order directs the person responsible for the obstruction/nuisance to remove it within a specified timeframe [1].

Essentially, Section 133 provides a mechanism for swift action against public nuisances that can potentially endanger public health, safety, or comfort. For more legal help please visit Kanoon India.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.