Stay of departmental inquiry during criminal prosecution 

Can I seek a stay of departmental inquiry during criminal prosecution? The government has filed a criminal case against me on the complaint of a MLA. That MLA has asked a question in the assembly and made several allegations against me. The government took the cognisance of those allegations and initiated a departmental inquiry. Later on a criminal case has filed against me. Both cases have the same allegations. I want a stay of departmental inquiry during the pendency of criminal case. Please help!

Can I seek a stay of departmental inquiry during criminal prosecution? The government has filed a criminal case against me on the complaint of a MLA. That MLA has asked a question in the assembly and made several allegations against me. The government took the cognisance of those allegations and initiated a departmental inquiry. Later on a criminal case has filed against me. Both cases have the same allegations. I want a stay of departmental inquiry during the pendency of criminal case. Please help!

The purpose of departmental inquiry and criminal prosecution is different. Punishing the delinquent officer for the offence he committed in the discharge of his duty is the basis principle behind the criminal prosecution. 

But in the departmental inquiry the basis purpose is to maintain discipline in the service. However, the allegations are the same in both proceedings but the purpose and effect of their result are different. 

You can request the government or appropriate authority to stay the disciplinary proceeding till the disposal of the criminal case if charges in the criminal proceedings are grave in nature. 

In Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. [(1999) 3 SCC 679] the Supreme Court has held that If the departmental proceedings and the criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts and the charge in the criminal case against the delinquent employee is of a grave nature which involves complicated questions of law and fact, it would be desirable to stay the departmental proceedings till the conclusion of the criminal case. 

You should bear in mind that if the criminal cas is getting delay the government can resume the departmental inquiry [Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Sarvesh Berry, (2005) 10 SCC 471]

There is no hard fast rule that when the department should stay the departmental inquiry until the disposal of criminal prosecution. These are the indicating factors for stay of disciplinary proceeding:

  • Early disposal of criminal case
  • Complexity of legal issue
  • Better appreciation of evidence
  • Serious effect of proceeding
  • Gravity of charge

You should move a representation to the concerned authority to stay the departmental proceedings until the disposal of criminal prosecution. But you cannot claim such a request as a matter of right. This is discretion of the government to accept or reject your representation. You can also request to change the inquiry officer.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Terminated from service for mere misconduct

This legal guidance explains the remedies available to an employee terminated from service for alleged misconduct without proper inquiry or proportional punishment. It discusses principles of natural justice, departmental proceedings, wrongful termination, reinstatement, back wages, and the legal remedies available before labour courts, tribunals, or constitutional courts.

Salary during termination period is illegally stopped by the department

This article discusses the legality of withholding salary during the period of termination or suspension from service. It examines the rights of an employee to claim salary, subsistence allowance, and other consequential benefits where the departmental action is alleged to be arbitrary, illegal, or contrary to service rules and principles of natural justice.

Daily wager service is terminated on misbehavior

This article discusses the legal implications of termination of service of a daily wager on allegations of misconduct or misbehavior. It examines whether principles of natural justice, departmental inquiry, and opportunity of hearing are required before terminating the services of a temporary or daily wage employee, along with the remedies available under labour and service laws.

Terminated from service by following illegal proceedings

This article examines the legality of termination orders passed after defective or unlawful departmental proceedings. It discusses violations of principles of natural justice, procedural irregularities in disciplinary inquiries, denial of reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the remedies available to an employee against illegal termination from service.