Tenant denied title and ownership of landlord
Question From: Property Law
Sir my tenant has filed a civil suit in the court of senior division Bhatinda. He claimed that he got interest in the property during tenancy. I am NRI and used to visit India 4-5 times in a year. I never alienated my property to anyone. He filed that suit after my receiving notice to vacate my house.
He had been paying rent for last 6 years but after the notice, past 7 months, he refused to pay rent and he filed this false case. I want to construct a hotel on the land so I need this property for my personal necessity. Please advise.
It is not disputed that he is your tenant. So a jural relation i.e. landlord and tenant has been established. It’ll be impossible for him to disprove this jural relation in the court. According to section 13 B of Punjab urban rent restriction act, tenant may vacate the premises for his personal necessity.
It is always presumed by the law that once a tenant pays the rent to his landlord then he cannot afterward denied it. This conduct of tenant confers him a legal obligation to pay rent and also confers a legal right to use it as long as he pays rent.
If tenant denied title of the landlord then a special provision is laid down by the law i.e. it is must for the tenant to first surrender the possession of the property back to landlord. He cannot enjoy both benefit simultaneously, in one hand he oppose the title of the landlord and in another hand live in the rented house.
Section 116 of Indian Evidence Act embodied that tenant in the occupation of the premises cannot denied the title and ownership of landlord. Doctrine of estoppel, which is basis of section 116, this doctrine will not allow the person to say one thing at one time and opposite of it at another time.
Contest the suit and prefer written statement with the plea that tenancy is not disputed, you have personal necessity and burden to disprove ownership and title of landlord shifts upon the plaintiff. In these circumstances you’ll win this case.
Image courtesy : google.com
Ask A Question
You can ask your question to Mr Shivendra Pratap Singh, (Advocate, High Court Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
Talk to Advocate
Talk to advocate on phone for 30 minutes and get solid legal advice
To view this protected post, enter the password below:
Section 340 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195. (1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be...
Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation And Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) entitles the flat buyer to claim a refund of money and compensation for any loss from the builder. If the builder did not complete the project within time he shall be liable to refund the money with interest.
Section 154 CrPC: Information in cognizable cases (FIR) (1) Every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, if given orally to an officer in charge of a police station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction, and be read Over...
Get A Quick Advice
Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes
Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe our newsletter to get our news as well as important legal updates of Supreme Court & High Courts