Tenant not deposited due rent in eviction suit

I filed an eviction suit for eviction of the tenant on several grounds and non-payment of rent is one of them. The suit is filed under section 12(1); 12(3)(a); 12(4) Bombay rents hotel and lodging-house rent control act 1947. The tenant has not been deposited due rent on serving many notices to him in the last three years. I need that house for residence because I am about to retire from a job. On repeated notice to him he reluctant to pay rent and also seek possession on the house by hook or crook. He complained in society about stopping…

I filed an eviction suit for eviction of the tenant on several grounds and non-payment of rent is one of them. The suit is filed under section 12(1); 12(3)(a); 12(4) Bombay rents hotel and lodging-house rent control act 1947. The tenant has not been deposited due rent on serving many notices to him in the last three years.

I need that house for residence because I am about to retire from a job. On repeated notice to him he reluctant to pay rent and also seek possession on the house by hook or crook. He complained in society about stopping basic facilities in house, demanding undue money for various purposes.

I want to know that if he’ll deposit due rent at any stage of proceeding can he get the protection of section 12[3][a] of said rent act?

The tenant has two opportunities to protect himself from eviction claimed on the ground of non-payment of rent. If tenant deposits due rent at the time of filing of a written statement or on the date of framing of issues he cannot be evicted. This provision is mandatory and the court cannot enlarge this opportunity on its discretion. You have to establish other grounds on which you claimed his eviction.

In Ratilal Balabhai Nazar vs Ranchhodbhai Shankerbhai Patel AIR 1967 SC; if there is statutory default or neglect on the part of the tenant, the landlord requires a right under section 12[3][a] to get a decree of eviction. But where the condition of said section is not satisfied there is a further opportunity given to the tenant to protect himself against eviction.

If the tenant did not deposit due rent on above-mentioned stages of proceeding he cannot protect himself from eviction by depositing due rent on the later stage of the proceeding. This is a mandatory provision and the court cannot give him another opportunity at any time after framing of issues.

At this stage, you should amend your plaint and plead his eviction on the ground of his failure to deposit due rent as required by section 12[3][a]. It is a preliminary issue and it shall be decided by the court under section 9-A CPC.

Tags: Civil Law

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.