Wife filed false case against me after my divorce petition


Question From: Family Law

My wife filed false case against me after filing of divorce petition from my side. She is a government employee and always desires to live separately. She mounted heavy pressure upon me to leave my parents and settled with her in Noida. She left matrimonial home on 30 April 2012.

I’m working as clerk in a government Intermediate school, although my job is transferable and I can easily get transfer from Lucknow to Noida but due to her dominating attitude I decided to live with my parents in Lucknow.

I filed a divorce petition on 5 July 2013 on the ground of cruelty thereupon she filed false criminal case against me and my other family members under section 498 A/504/506/323 IPC and 5/6 DP Act. She again mount pressure on me to withdraw my divorce petition but I want divorce at all. Kindly advice what I should do?

 Her subsequent act i.e. filing of criminal case in retaliation of divorce petition may constitute matrimonial cruelty if court acquits all the accused on the ground of false case. It may be possible that criminal case take more time to decide but during the trial of criminal case you have to amend your divorce petition and take additional plea of divorce i.e. matrimonial cruelty and stall the proceeding till the decision of criminal case.

In K. Srinivas Rao vs D. A. Deepa AIR 2013 SC; it is held by the supreme court that filing of false case by the wife against her husband is a matrimonial cruelty and it shall constitute a ground of divorce.

This decision is reiterated by the same court in K. Srinivas vs K. Sunita [2015] 2 SCC; Matrimonial cruelty is a ground of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) Hindu marriage act 1955. It is easy to file false case but proving it beyond all reasonable doubt it so difficult. It is general awareness in public that once plea of cruelty is taken by wife it strikes down all the relives of husband in matrimonial cases.

In Lalita Kumari vs State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 2014 SC, Priyanka Srivastava Vs State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 2015 SC; it is held by the supreme court that preliminary inquiry must be made by the court before taking cognizance of case towards matrimonial disputes.

Court is bound to initiate preliminary inquiry in complaint under section 498 – A of IPC and section 5/6 D. P. Act. At this stage you cannot challenge cognizance of the complaint on above mentioned case law. You have to contest your case.

Image courtesy : google.com 

Ask A Question

You can ask your question to Mr Shivendra Pratap Singh, (Advocate, High Court Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)

Talk to Advocate

Talk to advocate on phone for 30 minutes and get solid legal advice 

Section 340 of the code of criminal procedure (CrPC) perjury

Section 340 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195. (1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be...

Claim refund of money against the builder under RERA

Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation And Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) entitles the flat buyer to claim a refund of money and compensation for any loss from the builder. If the builder did not complete the project within time he shall be liable to refund the money with interest.

Section 154 the code of criminal procedure (crpc)

Section 154 CrPC: Information in cognizable cases (FIR) (1) Every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, if given orally to an officer in charge of a police station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction, and be read Over...

quick Advice

Get A Quick Advice

Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes

Talk to a Lawyer Today!

Book a phone consultation for 30 minutes and get solid advice on the phone

Contact a lawyer in Lucknow

30 Min. Consultation


Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe our newsletter to get our news as well as important legal updates of Supreme Court & High Courts

Share via