Execution of foreign judgment in India

There is an unique procedure for execution of foreign judgment in India. When a foreign court cannot execute its judgment or decree in India because it has no territorial jurisdiction. In this situation the decree holder shall file a fresh civil suit in India on the basis of the decree of foreign court. According to […]

There is an unique procedure for execution of foreign judgment in India. When a foreign court cannot execute its judgment or decree in India because it has no territorial jurisdiction. In this situation the decree holder shall file a fresh civil suit in India on the basis of the decree of foreign court.

According to section 2(6) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), “foreign judgment” means the judgment of a foreign Court. The foreign court is defined under section 2(5) as “foreign Court” means a Court situate outside India and not established or continued by the authority of the Central Government.

Execution of foreign judgment

A foreign judgment cannot be executed in India directly as Indian judgment. Under Indian law, there are two ways of getting a foreign judgment enforced. Firstly by filing an Execution Petition under Section 44 A of the CPC (in case the conditions specified therein are fulfilled) and secondly by filing a suit upon the foreign judgment / decree.

However, for the execution of foreign decree the Indian court will test its validity under Section 13 CPC. This section specifies certain exceptions under which the foreign judgment becomes inconclusive and is therefore not executable or enforceable in India.

Also read: How to set aside ex-parte decree?

Under Section 13 CPC (Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) a foreign judgment becomes inconclusive and consequently unenforceable in the following circumstances:

  • where it has not been pronounced by a Court of competent jurisdiction;
  • where it has not been given on the merits of the case;
  • where it appears on the face of the proceedings to be founded on an incorrect view of international law or a refusal to recognise the law of India in cases in which such law is applicable;
  • where the proceedings in which judgment was obtained are opposed to natural justice;
  • where it has been obtained by fraud;
  • where it sustains a claim founded on a breach of any law in force in India.

Therefore for the execution of foreign judgment, it must comply the conditions of section 13 CPC. The decree of foreign court is a piece of evidence and Indian court shall admit the certified copy of foreign decree as genuine. By getting a decree in the foreign Court, the plaintiff has only avoided the inconvenience of leading evidence in the Indian Courts.

Tags: Civil Law

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.