A person gave me a post-dated cheque but now refusing to pay it 

A person gave me a post-dated cheque but now refusing to pay it. The post-dated cheque will mature on 10/05/2020. Sir, I want to know what should I do in this situation?

A person gave me a post-dated cheque but now refusing to pay it. The post-dated cheque will mature on 10/05/2020. Sir, I want to know what should I do in this situation?

You cannot take any legal action against that person before the maturity of the post-dated cheque. The drawer issues the post-dated cheque for the discharge of debt or liability. When he issues the said post-dated cheque he admits that he has some financial liability. Therefore, the law will presume the existence of financial liability under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

In this situation, you should wait for the date of maturity of the post-dated cheque. You should present that cheque before the bank on the date of maturity. If he dishonours the cheque due to insufficient amount or any other reason then you should proceed against him. The oral statement or intimation of the drawer that he will not pay the cheque has no legal validity.

You should not rely on his oral statement before the date of maturity of the post-dated cheque. No cause of action arises out of that oral statement. According to Section 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, the cause of action arises when the drawer does not pay the amount within 15 days of receiving the demand notice.

Therefore, you have to follow the procedure given in the Negotiable Instrument Act. The oral statement of the person that he will not pay the cheque amount has no legal sanctity. You cannot initiate any legal action on the basis of his oral statement.

Presentment of cheque

You should present the cheque within three months from the date of maturity. Presentment of the cheque within time is mandatory under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. If you do not present the cheque within a time the post-dated cheque will lost its legal status. The cheque is an instrument for discharging of the debt or liability and it is valid for three months from the date of maturity.

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act said that the cheque should be presented to the bank within a period of three months. After the amendment in section 138, the period of maturity is shortened by three months. Before the amendment, there was a six month period for the presentment of the cheque

Send a demand notice

If that person (drawer) refuses to make the payment of the post-dated cheque then you should give him a demand notice within 30 days. The time period of 30 days starts when you receive the memo of dishonour of cheque from the bank.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.